Political Rants' Journal|
[Most Recent Entries]
Below are the 20 most recent journal entries recorded in
Political Rants' LiveJournal:
[ << Previous 20 ]
[ << Previous 20 ]
|Friday, April 6th, 2007|
With a keyboard on loan from God, I am the Independent Blogger of the Office of the Independent Blogger. Allow me to introduce you to my site if you haven't heard of it before. I do hope you visit and stay -- add it to a Feed, bookmark it.
My latest post is a satire of Mitt Romney,
who is more Elmer Fudd than John Wayne, more Michael Dukakis than George H.W. Bush. It's a look at his -- and his state's -- Looney Toon Politics.
Earlier today, I wrote about Disney recognizing gay relationships,
which is good news, and Florida law forbidding people from feeding homeless people, which makes even a sane man wish himself Libertarian!
A couple of days ago I looked at Newt Gingrich's comments about bilingual education
and the whole ugly matter of textbooks being censored or neglecting portions of history.
For those of you interested in Congressional politics, I looked at portions of the Democratic agenda
and outline the potential pitfalls and my own opinions on these ideas. A small excerpt, in response to Price's warning of the price Democrats might pay for going too far with certain things: "I’ll buy that. If the Democrats, say, pass a bill legalizing gay marriage and pledge to give money to terrorists, they’d be homosexual Ronald Reagans — and out of work come 2008." And then I took a serious look at their agenda. The Democratic Agenda.Here
I chide Bush's chief policy strategist in 2004 for now saying Bush is wrong. (Of course he's wrong -- my argument is that Dowd is not someone to appreciate in any sense of the term because his whole behavior suggests he's an idiot.
Here, at OkayStupid, I Got It!
we've got a look at Online Politics and the recent announcement that Barack Obama raised more money than Hillary did...on the Internet,
and the dishonest, ridiculous manner the whole situation was covered in by the media and on the Internets. (And here we've got a deep apology
to Barack Obama's intern...who I told that I was a Republican because I can't possibly donate to his campaign on principal or prudence.)</a> (And here, on a final note on the matter, we've got a better look at the media's coverage of Obama/Clinton
and a casual look at billionaires v. government when it comes to newspapers.)
A short post here, pithy,
that would be longer in summary than whole!
Small post here,
too, about Thompson's Presidential announcement. An excerpt: I didn’t know that the Department of Health and Human Services was a launchpad for Presidential ambitions, but I suppose it is now with Tommy Thompson’s announcement that he’s running for President. I, for one, am not sure what to make of it. He’s angling himself as a reliable Conservative but that’s what Senator Brownback is in the race for. Perhaps he’ll catch fire if Brownback’s big mouth catches up to him, but otherwise I don’t think he’s got much of a chance to make waves.
Of course, there are hundreds of posts beyond that, and I update daily. I'd like to think I have a good idea what I'm talking about and
an excellent sense of humor, but I'll leave that up to you, and I hope you agree to stay at the Office of the Independent Blogger, open daily for business!
|Wednesday, November 8th, 2006|
I am the Independent Blogger of the Office of the Independent Blogger. I took a hiatus of about a week and a half and returned to blogging today. I thought I'd refer you all to my blog, and sample it for you as well.
As I gloated in my latest political entry,
I called the Rumsfeld resignation on October first and I called it for either today or January. To quote,On October first, I wrote,
The more I read of the new Woodward book, State of Denial, the more apparent it becomes to me that Donald Rumsfeld will finally lose his job. Either the day after the Midterm Elections, or in January. That’s how George Walker works. He won’t want to give anything up to the Defeatocrats before the Elections, but I reckon Rumsfeld’s done for.
A few times I’ve waivered slightly, wondering if Bush just might really be dumb enough to allow Rumsfeld’s further presence at the Department of Defense, but I always believed that the writing was on the wall and I do believe myself a Boy who can read the President, whoever it may be. Needless to say, Rumsfeld has stepped down, and now it’s up to a new man to try and wipe Baghdad clean, something that I think is all too possible. Wars don’t end overnight and however dramatic losses may be (and Iraq’s aren’t that bad, in perspective) there is always prospect for Victory. If this new man means that George Bush is serious about changing course in Iraq (which it seems he is, in a roundabout, Bushian way, as he said today, to that same question, “Well, there’s certainly going to be new leadership at the Pentagon”) then that is nothing but a good thing.
The President’s committment, and vision, remains dubious, however. Bush has defeated Rumsfeld; now can he defeat their collective mistakes of the last four years? This is the sort of change that gives old supporters of the War new hope — cautious, tempered hope, but hope all the same.
Yes, I am, as an old but hesitant supporter of the Iraq War, take new hope from this event but I genuinely fear that it's far too little too late. Here, on this page, titled Inevitabilities are Inevitable,
I write about Tuesday's election results, Today’s Chicago Tribune led off with the headline, Democrats’ Day! but I feel that the New York Times did the public one better when they wrote, a Loud Message for Bush. The truth is that yesterday’s election was a message to Bush rather than a reaffirmation of Liberalism, and it is also a Finally Election, meaning that it’s The One that Shouldn’t Have Gotten Away Like the Others Did. That is, 2002 should’ve been a good year to be a Democrat and 2004 was not an election that Bush should’ve won. This year was similar in circumstance and for once, the Democratic Party was able to capitalize without ruining its own prospects, and the credit should go, as far as organizing the rout, to Chuck Schumer in the Senate and Rahm Emmanuel in the House for not Shrumming up a sure thing.
All through the year I was sure of three things: the Republicans would lose seats, Rick Santorum would be handily defeated and Rod Blagojevich would be re-elected Governor of Illinois. Whether or not the Democrats would take the House was something I was leaning Yes on but wasn’t confident enough to declare because of the Mathematics of Redistricting. I’m glad, enough, that the Democrats have taken the House and might still take the Senate, but I must say I feel bad for the President.
King George can’t govern with a Republican Congress. Imagine how he’ll fail with a Divided Government!
I noted the irony of the GOP defeat being fueled by Iraq.
Check it out and read it often. It's updated daily, and it's updated quite well, I must say in my unbiased and wholly independent way.
|Wednesday, August 9th, 2006|
Hello everyone, I am the Independent Blogger of the Office of the Independent Blogger.
Before we talk politics, I've got a new section on my website that I'd like to quickly plug: the Office of the Independent Poet.
You'll find a bunch of the poems I've written on there, and it's all in good fun, I say. Now, to politics, which.....aren't.
In regard to political analysis, there's this,
where I talk about Joe Lieberman's recent defeat, and I stand up for him, more or less, because I believe he deserves to be stood up for. Similarly, there's this,
about Hillary Clinton's chances to run/not run in 2008. ( An Excerpt.Collapse )
Additionally, there is criticism of the Lebanese Invasion and the Bush Administration's treatment of it. On the subject of War, we have my thoughts here,
specifically about the recent statements made by Generals in the military about Iraq. In response to an embarrassing story about George Bush's lack of knowledge preceding the Invasion, I write this: "I’d like to know what type of deal George Bush made with the Devil to give him the Presidency, but so far, Antonin Scalia won’t answer my phone calls, and William Rehnquist is dead!"
You can read the criticisms here,
as well as a look at the Ukraine's recent politics. I love Eastern Europe.
Here, we have a look at Cuba and War Profiteers,
and here we have one of my favorite posts,
an entry looking at the "inevitability" of War with Iran, in which I look at past "inevitable conflicts." It's a good read, but then again, I believe everything
on my site is, as, excuse my lack of humility, I believe that my blog is the best under-the-radar look at politics online. While I'm sure there's disagreement with that notion, my blog is
very good, and I'm proud of it.
Finally, on an International and more traditionally Liberal note, there's this: Cold as Ice,
where we have a post about the savage beating of Seals, as well as a silly anecdote about an old project of mine involving Seal E., seal claps and Arctic Ice City.
Given that we're talking about ice, let's talk about global warming.
Read through, and bookmark it, please!
|Saturday, May 13th, 2006|
I am, as you undoubtedly already know, the Independent Blogger of the Office of the Independent Blogger, independent in the same sense that Ken Starr was meaning "not very independent" indeed. I blog with a keyboard on loan from God, and here we go.
My latest post, and the first I'll direct you to, is Apples and Oranges
, where the subject turns from the polling of the President to Iran's wacky letter, with a stop in front of the political fights of the week (Howard Dean v. some critics, Frist v. critics, Boehner v. critics, and Muffin Man v. Baker) before closing with the price of butter in Langley.
Not bad, eh?
In my next post, we talk politics, thus leading me to title the post, "Talking Politics."
Reverse Federalism and State's Rights are discussed, along with the inherent seriousness of an Al Gore candidacy, followed by some points about John Kerry and Hillary Clinton.
On a personal level, I have been criticized by many Liberal Democrats for two things: my support of the War and Iraq, and my timid opposition to the NSA's wiretapping. Before, I used to condemn the program but I didn't go so far as to call it an abuse of power. In light of recent revelations, however, I don't think there's a way to deny that George Bush is Richard Nixon Reloaded.
A preview:( Richard Nixon Reloaded.Collapse )
The day before that, I'd labeled President Bush Jimmy Carter With Rabies,
and I think it's fair to stand by that. In that post, I discuss his human rights record and a few impressive notes, but then we get to the CIA.
My view of the CIA, currently, is that it is the victim of an Honor Killing of sorts. Yes, I'm willing to say that Bush is attempting to kill the CIA for "honor."
Afterward, you can look here for an analysis of the UN and the global poker games being played,
including my first note on the Iranian Letter to Bush. My thoughts on it at the time? A few more poker matches are left to talk about. The first involves Iran. First, Blair today said that any suggestion of “nuking Iran” is “absurd.” It is. I’m proud of him for saying that, as it’ll provide some level of sanity to the discourse. Next, on Iran, their President has written Bush a letter in what they’re labeling an attempt to push forward talks. The Iranians say they’ll publicly release it when Bush receives it. Here’s to hoping they knew to put enough stamps on and, you know, write it in English.
To close, here
there's talk of the spooky shenanigans going on in the world and at the UN, this post about the men in power who are dropping like cash at an Abramoff meeting.
If you'd be so kind, check out the site and if you enjoy it (I don't see how you couldn't) then do do me a favor and forward links to it to your friends or make a post in your own blogs. I'd surely return the favor, if asked.
|Tuesday, April 25th, 2006|
I am the Independent Blogger of the Office of the Independent Blogger,
and I have a variety of posts to highlight from my blog.
First we talk about Dinosaurs, Awards and Politics,
specifically relating to Ted Kennedy, Bipartisanship, unauthorized leaking and Richard Nixon. An excerpt? "Pat Buchanan is out calling any leak of classified information treasonous, and bemoaning the granting of a Pulitzer Prize to the woman who ran the article on secret CIA prisons. In other news, he still thinks Richard Nixon the greatest President since Caligula."Strength in Numbers,
where we talk about the military backlash against Rumsfeld as well as the effect of sagging poll numbers. The closing line, "As everyone knows, strength is something that can be found in numbers, but not always. Hundred million dollar lawsuits don’t bring strength to Maury Povich much like thirty two percent approval ratings don’t help the average President, but George Bush isn’t the average President. Charges of incompetence and lack of evidence serve as spinach to Bush’s popeye, bubba, and he wouldn’t have it any other way."
Next we talk about Cursed Terms,
specifically the Second Term Curse,</a> Karl Rove's clipping, the Phone Jamming plot that's starting to become Bush's Watergate, and a ripping of Bush for his label as "the freedom President." An excerpt: "Even a few months ago, I’d have never imagined that this sort of phone-jamming incident would be occurring in today’s Washington, but I shouldn’t have given Bush that much credit, I guess. What’s the difference between Karl Rove and Chuck Colson? One of them claims to have reformed himself, while the other wants to firebomb Iran!" If you know your 1960s history, then you know Chuck Colson is notorious for wanting to firebomb the Brookings institute. More on the Watergate-sequel can be found here,
along with some notes on Brent Scowcroft.Here
we have a pithy post about gas prices.
Next up is Carnal Congress
about the oversexed Katherine Harris and the nature of Republican government today. Excerpt: "I am aware that this post is heavier with sexual entendres than Harris’ face is with makeup, but that’s okay. When you’re dealing with a carnal Congress that loves screwing people over, it’s all right to be explicit. Besides, I’m only making a point as to the nature of the Republicans we’re dealing with — people who pretend to be puritans but cuddle on the floor of the House. How do Republicans get away with this? By promising to outlaw sex toys in South Carolina. Maybe that’s Karl Rove’s next platform to run on? Or maybe it’s because we’ve got people with goals such as those listed above that our country’s wallowing in so many problems?"
Here we look at politics as a game of survival, and specifically talk about Hillary Clinton and the 2008 elections, Iraq's Prime Minister, Rick Santorum and Karl Rove.
Finally, there's Iran and Global Warming, including notes on Al Gore.
To close, we have Brokeback Washington
about the Bush White House, and it's a nifty satire, if I do say so myself.
|Wednesday, April 5th, 2006|
Hi everyone. I'm Gregory Pratt, the Independent Blogger
from The Office of the Independent Blogger.
Since Christmas, my website was on a hiatus due to a variety of small issues but now it's back, and so am I. It's back for good, and in that regard, so, too, am I.
I'm still "Independent" in the same sense that Ken Starr was. Which means "Not Very Independent" indeed. I blog from the Left side of the Political Spectrum, but I flirt with Conservatism on Iraq, and maybe one or two much smaller things. Which means that my wisecrack about being as Independent as Ken Starr is me Kidding on the Square -- kidding, but meaning it to a point. Or maybe I really am Independent like Starr, who, while a Right Wing Hatchet Man of the Worst Kind, also happens to do noble work against the Death Penalty.
I share his independence, if we look at it that way, to a point. But I don't hunt after the President's penis like he does. No sir. Truth be told, some people have told me that I flirt with Conservatism, and I like to say back, "I don't. I tease Conservates." Jokes aside, I'm quite fond of my blog, both because I try to interject humor into the issues of today and because I love government. And so allow me to pique your prurient interest with a few titillating articles I've got up. First we've got the Tax Code Samba,
similar to the Texas Two Step in that you'll never see me doing it. You see, I'm not much of a dancer. Or a fighter, for that matter. I play baseball instead.
My favorite post of the week is (Democratic) Party Like It's 1999
about the Clintons, DeLay, Al Gore and the future of Congress, 2008 and a brief mention of Larry Flynt and The Gingrich who Shut Down the Government.
Then there's "Gobble Gorba,"
an article refuting the recent statements of Mikhail Gorbachev who has found the time to sneak out of his grave and praise Vladimir Putin while tackling America. The premise of it is that Gorbachev is a turkey. A noble concept, to be sure.
With the demise of Tom DeLay dominating the news this week, here's my take on the failed exterminator.
I find it deliciously ironic that the gas man poisoned himself in his haste to wipe out his enemies.
Next we talk about a stupid article and Savings.
There's no further precursor to that.
In the next picture, I Policy Wonk about Isolationism, the Policy Wonk Chief of Staff, and the CIA.
Finally, I write about Incessant Bothers in Government and Society.
That's not all on the blog, just the more recent posts.
So, yes. Go visit the Office of the Independent Blogger, independent in the same sense that Ken Starr was. Enjoy yourselves.
|Wednesday, March 22nd, 2006|
Russian KGB and Nazi in Polish Parliament
This photo is absolutely real. The person on photo is the deputy of the Polish Sejm (national parliament) from populist Self-Defense (Samoobrona) party Mr. Mateusz Piskorski. He is known as editor-in-chief of nazi-rasist magazine “Odala”, as leader of Polish skinhead’s movement and radical anti-semite who has been elected in parliament in 2005.
In “Odala” Mateusz Piskorski sang the praises of the “Aryan Race”, Hitler, SS, Gestapo with their struggle against “world Jewish plot” and ideologies “foreign to our race, like Christianity, Liberalism, and Marxism” publishing interviews with Holocaust deniers. Except for that, he and the leader of parliamentary fraction of populist Self-Defense party Andrzej Lepper are the big fans of Russian president Vladimir Putin and of Belarus dictator Alexander Lukashenko.
Last five years skinhead Mateusz Piskorsky some times visited Russia where he has old friends among Russian Nazis. Many of them are connected with former KGB which has now renamed in “Federal Security Service of Russia” (FSB in Russian).
Vladimir Putin and Russian Ministry for Foreign Affairs have accepted the special political program concerning Eastern Europe. So, in 2005 agent of FSB and well known Russian Nazi Alexei Kochetkov has organized the official visit of his friend Mateusz Piskorski to small, but very criminal “state” Transdniestria (rebel part of Moldova) with the purpose of political support of local dictatorship. Heads of Transdniestria are searched by the Interpol for the illegal traffic in arms and weapons, the murders, money-laundering, terrorism, genocide and drug traffic. But they have the Russian citizenship personally and use Russian support in their policy. Actually FSB supervises a situation in this rebel region and colleagues of Vladimir Putin receive a lot of money from Transdniestrian criminal business.
During his visit to Transdniestria the deputy of Polish parliament Mateusz Piskorski on behalf of Poland, on behalf of Self-Defense party and its leader Andrzej Lepper confirm “legality and correctness” of not free and completely forged parliamentary elections in this rebel region. After that Russia has started to provide nonofficial financial support of Piskorski’s and Lepper’s activity. So, now Self-Defense party (one of the most influential Polish political parties) is financed by Russians through the Polish Nazi and known agents of FSB-KGB.
Deputies of Polish parliament receive some of Russian money, as fees for the participation in election monitoring in the countries of former Soviet Union (Belarus dictator Alexander Lukashenko, dictator of Uzbekistan Islam Karimov, former Ukraine Prime Minister Victor Yanukovich and others) in their struggle against the democratic oppositions during the elections.. In 2005 Mateusz Piskorski has been registered, as the observer from CIS Election Monitoring Organization (CIS EMO) on elections of Transdniestrian parliament. This Russian nongovernmental organization has been created by agent of FSB Alexei Kochetkov under direction of FSB. CIS EMO purpose consists in public support of the proRussian state leaders.
Now Russian KGB-Nazi Alexei Kochetkov, racist Polish deputy Mateusz Piskorski and another members of Self-Defense party are registered on elections of the Ukrainian Parliament, as the observer from CIS EMO. According to Ukrainian mass-media, FSB (through CIS EMO) has already transferred money to Andrzej Lepper and soon Mateusz Piskorski will arrive to Ukraine with his colleagues from Polish parliament. Their purpose consists in support of the proRussian political parties on Ukrainian elections.
In more detail about relations of Polish parliament, Self-Defense party, the Polish Nazi and Russian KGB look in clause published in Ukrainian magazine "Tribuna", informational agency “Maidan”, Polish newspaper “Gazeta Wyborcza”, “Searchlight” and others media.
It is possible to receive comments from the Poland also:
Self-Defense (Samoobrona) party and parliamentary fraction:
Phones: +48 (22) 6942583 (parliamentary fraction), +48 (22) 6250472 (party office)
Faxes: +48 (22) 6250477 (party office), +48 (22) 6942606 (parliamentary fraction),
Deputy of Polish parliament Mr. Mateusz Piskorski:
phones: +48 (22) 6942583, +48 (91) 8122658, e-mail: Mateusz.Piskorski@sejm.pl
Chairman of Polish parliament Mr. Marek Jurek:
Fax: + 48 (22) 694 22 13, e-mail: Marek.Jurek@sejm.pl
|Wednesday, March 1st, 2006|
I've started a new community, scotus_news
Intended for Supreme Court news and links (to op-ed articles, decisions, cases, and gossip about possible retirements or whatever) - no rants, discussion limited to comments.
If you're interested, please join and post.
|Wednesday, February 22nd, 2006|
"After careful review by our government, I believe the transaction ought to go forward," Bush told reporters who had traveled with him on Air Force One to Washington. "I want those who are questioning it to step up and explain why all of a sudden a Middle Eastern company is held to a different standard than a Great British company. I am trying to conduct foreign policy now by saying to the people of the world, `We'll treat you fairly.'"
It is about time.
|Wednesday, February 1st, 2006|
State of the Union Address
So last night at work we listened to the Little Lord's State of the Union address. Although I'm willing to admit there are issues that this administration is publicizing that I'm relieved to finally see given real airtime (AIDS in Africa, the very real contribution that immigrants make to our economy and culture, etc.), I still think we're on a sinking ship, and here's why:
1. The president repeatedly refers to both making tax "relief" permanent and recognizing that democracy requires "strong, accountable institutions," and "institutions for education, science and medicine." What exactly does the president think pays for and supports those "strong, accountable institutions?" Shifting even more support away from publically-owned institutions (funded via tax dollars) to privately-funded solutions is just going to exacerbate the problems we have now: out-of-control backdoor lobbying, conflicts of interests and opaque informational systems.
2. The president repeatedly refers to guarding against an isolationist stance (which I agree with) and with the production capabilities of the American worker. That's all fine and good, but it completely misses the point that as we march into our mechanized future, there are going to be fewer and fewer production-based jobs that require human beings and, in the end, there are going to be fewer and fewer traditional "jobs." The old system of rampant production and consumption isn't going to work, not on an economic, spiritual or environmental level. "Buy American" is no longer going to work, period, and until people begin to recognize this no real structural changes are going to be made to accomodate it. Instead we're going to keep making political and personal decisions based on a system that's already on its way out the door. That said, instead of viewing the onslaught of retiring Baby Boomers as a burden, we should be viewing them as an incredible resource for non-profit institutions. There is no reason we cannot tie public benefits (ie, "entitlements") with public service. Not only would this strengthen our communities and enrich the lives of often lonely and isolated older folks, it would provide many needed services for the numerous disenfranchised sectors of our society.
3. For all his talk about changing the shape of the future, his administration (and each before it) still frames everything in the language of "In a system of two parties..." and "In a market-based global economy..." Funny how we're allowed to be visionaries on any front that doesn't actually challenge the primacy of our crappy two-party system or exploitative market-based economies. So basically, change the future, but not so much that you displace what keeps our elite in their seats. Whatever.
4. History Lesson: I am SO tired of the WWII myth. Listen up folks, WE did not win World War II. WE did not carry the brunt of that war and WE shouldn't be so proud of our place in it. When the president (and everyone else) makes ridiculous statements like "We are the nation that saved liberty in Europe," it only shows the rest of the world 1. how ill-educated we are on our very own history and 2. how blindly nationalistic we are. The Russians carried that war and won it, whether or not they were there for the glory moments. Kinda like Reagan taking credit for Carter's hostage negotiations, we've taken credit for the 20million Russian lives sacrficed and lost to fighting the Nazis. Please stop perpetuating this myth. PLEASE. And, on that note, stop using WWII as a justification for the creation of Isreal. I'm definitely for the "what's done is done" view but stop trying to convince me that the Zionists somehow deserve Isreal because the Germans tried wiping them out. If that were the case there would also be a Gaylandia and Cripakastan for the other 2 'aberrations' the Nazis tried to wipe out: homosexuals and folks with birth defects.
5. Choice: Okay, I know this is OBVIOUS but how the hell does he get to use "Choose your own future" rhetoric and still impede a woman's right to choose an abortion? True, I don't think I could ever make the choice to have one myself but I still recognize that it's not MY choice to make. Furthermore, systemically blocking access and information about birth control and abortion is setting us up for more crime, more poverty and more seriously pissed off people.
6. God Talk: I'm so tired of Jesusland. Seriously. If and when I need spiritual guidance, I will consult my priest/iman/rabbi/horoscope/lawn/whateve
r. In the meantime, I expect the president to act like the PUBLIC SERVANT that he is and not the Christian Soldier. And, if he's unable to do that, I consider it a breach of contract. What does the Declaration of Independence say about breach of contract again? I'm just saying.
|Sunday, January 29th, 2006|
"A lie told often enough becomes truth."
- Vladamir Lenin
It seems to me that this is happening. The message that is being drilled into our heads is one of ignorance and complete falseness. George Bush would love to have us all believe that it's so simple. Bush wants us to think that our enemies attacked us in totally unprovoked attacks, because they hated our freedom. Conservatives, nationalists and idiots are willingly lead by the dilusional president because they don't want to think about anything that WE may have done. It's much easier to accept that they hated our freedom, even though that's a complete mockery of the truth. The people who usually look for scapegoats to put the blame on, have happily, willingly and ignorantly overlooked the real facts and chose instead to pick up their guns and go to kill everyone with a turban and a dislike of our oppressive foreign policy in the Middle East.
So what's the truth?"We say our terror against America is blessed terror in order to put an end to suppression, in order for the United States to stop its support to Israel."
- Osama Bin Laden
It sounds like our enemies are saying that our outragious support of Israel is leading a lot of support against us. I can see why. The double standard he have for the region is a disgrace. Look at the way we've treated Iran, making it out to be a hostile country, making it out of be a violent country, manipulating the media to make it sound like Iran has any nuclear weapons, capability of making nuclear weapons in the short term, or any intent of hostility towards our allies. We know Isreal has weapons. We know Israel has the full intent of using them illegally. Yet when the UN weapons inspectors tried to get into Isreal to inspect their weapons, and Isreal told them to get lost, they promptly did get lost and nothing was said of it again. Maybe it's THIS double standard that provokes them."If inciting people to do that (9/11) is terrorism, and if killing those who kill our sons is terrorism, then let history be witness that we are terrorists."
- Osama Bin Laden
"Just like you kill us, we will kill you."
- Osama Bin Laden
Perhaps this is the reason they hate us? The countless people we've killed, we don't know exactly how many, because it's "not our responsibility to count dead Iraqis" but there are very many. Look at the million (at least) people we killed with sanctions on Iraq during the 1990s, mostly the sick, the elderly, then women and the children. Look at the war that we provoked between Iran and Iraq because the US were scared shitless of the Islamic revolution. A million people died. Or perhaps it was the constant airstrikes on that region that have been going on, unpublished by the media, for the last decade. It's not that anyone was hiding it, it just wasn't news anymore. Airstrikes like the one only days ago, targeted at the supposed target of Ayman al-Zawahiri, uncleared by the Pakistani government, and it turns out that the strike killed 17 local men, women and children instead. Airstrikes like the one the US planned on Al Jazeera, a civilian target, an utterly illegal proposition."Your security is not in the hands of Kerry or Bush or al Qaeda. Your security is in your own hands. Each and every state that does not tamper with our security will have automatically assured its own security."
- Osama Bin Laden
"Free people do not relinquish their security. This is contrary to Bush's claim that we hate freedom. Let him tell us why we did not strike Sweden, for example."
- Osama Bin Laden
This clearly blows apart the myth that we were attacked because we're a peaceful, heavenly and downright great bunch of people.
So with all of this in mind, what did we do about this hostility with the Middle East and the (more than) billion Muslim people that now see us for what we really are? What we SHOULD have done, is drained support for our enemies. We should have stopped our illegal weapons support of Israel's illegal occupation of Palestinian land. We should have stopped our oppression of the Middle East.
Why DIDN'T we do that?
Middle Eastern resources, obviously. The biggest oil supplies in the world are in the arabic Middle Eastern countries. The biggest natural gas supplies outside of Russia are in the Middle East. We couldn't let all this blood money slip away, regardless of how many people die.
Did our enemies notice this?"This war in Iraq makes millions of dollars for big corporations, either weapons manufacturers or those working in the reconstruction, such as Halliburton and its sister companies... It is crystal clear who benefits from igniting the fire of this war and this bloodshed: They are the merchants of war, the bloodsuckers who run the policy of the world from behind the scenes."
- Osama Bin Laden
Sometimes the best way to understand a war, isn't to listen to our own leaders, but rather, the leaders of the other side. Maybe then, we'd see what we really are.
|Wednesday, December 21st, 2005|
Today, to my school came Bernadine Dohrn. She was the leader of the Weather Underground, the 1960s Communist group that planned to overthrow the government, set off bombs in the Pentagon and the US Capitol Building, and raised hell. The Dohrn of today is a different woman, calmer, less dogmatic and willing to engage in a dialogue. Our class questioned her, with me easily taking the lead role, and her answers were candid and worth reading, for sure. Here it is, my write-up of all that occurred.
|Wednesday, December 14th, 2005|
I'm Greg Pratt, the Chief of the Office of the Independent Blogger. The headline of my site reads, "Independent in the same sense that Ken Starr was which means not very Independent indeed." For almost all of the time that I've had this website, since the Spring, that has been a sarcastic joke. Now, as we approach tomorrow's elections in Iraq, I have found myself to be Bipartisan by Iraq.
Check it out and, in the meantime, here's two paragraphs that I'm quite proud of:( Read more...Collapse )
If I were less capable of spelling, our current path on the matter of Iran would elicit just as much support as Iraq does from me but it doesn't. When you've caught fire in a chemist's lab, you don't stop drop and roll: you shower yourself in the corner of the room. It's the same with Iran.
Give it a read through -- you'll never believe how ridiculous some Conservative ideas are for dealing with the Mullahs. Want a hint? "Leave the Nukes, Take Out The Mullahs." Brilliant,
if only it would work
Ever have the government ban smoking in your city? I have. And have you ever been bothered by your party's reaction to an article that may be fake? I have. Ever thought that the President was being less than candid? I have, and you can read about these things here.
While we're talking about a political potpourri, there's Tookie Williams, who has now been executed, and here is Me on why he's Not Redeemed At All.
Surprisingly, for a Liberal, I am not a huge fan of the 9/11 Commission. I think they're as out of order as they claim our current security measures are.
So is the Congress, the Pentagon and the Law Schools who have a Case before the SCOTUS. I consider myself a candid guy. I'm honest. There's just no two ways about it as I call things like I see them and keep an open mind. Here, I write about a lack of candor,
and end on this note: "Candor, on a last note, is increasingly hard to come by and al-Qaeda has none to spare. Bin Laden’s top Deputy to America: “bin Laden still alive and in charge.” More like, “Either hiding like a scalded dog or dead in the mountains.”
On December Seventh, Republicans Pearl Harbored Al Gore, accusing him of having given Russia permission to sell Iran nuclear weapons. For a moment, let's ignore Cheney's lobbying on behalf of an end to sanctions on Iran in the 1990s and talk about "the case against Gore,"
or, as I like to call it, a failed and transparent attempt to slander him and his dead father.
Saddam Hussein's trial, the Right's fear of a Fight over Alito, the War on Christmas!
and Rick Santorum's claim that he's helped "save Social Security" are all discussed here.
There are rumors of Chief of Staff to the President Andrew Card being fired and sent to Treasury, with Rumsfeld resigning and Lieberman taking his place. All of this would be bad for the country and wrong politically, for all parties involved, and so here is me on White House Politics.
You've all heard the expression that Truth is Stranger than Fiction, correct? Well, in today's Washington Truth is Stranger Than Gingrich.
That's all I'll say about that for now.
On December Third, I attended a Hillary Clinton speech in Chicago and here's my writeup.
There were protesters, too, and it was an interesting day. Interesting as this post about the poisoning of our political stream.
I know it's not exactly an original thought, that one, but it's still worth commenting on and I'd be mighty glad if you checked it. Finally, let me direct you here. Enjoy!
I am the Independent Blogger of the Office of the Independent Blogger.
|Sunday, November 6th, 2005|
At The Office of the Independent Blogger
I make it a point to address the most important, pressing issues of the day. I make it a point to find things that others aren't discussing, and I do my best to provide insight and interesting commentary. If anyone would care to add me as a result of it, just do so and let me know so I can add you back.
President George W. Bush needs to grow a pair.
Of White Sox. Using the Chicago White Sox as my model, I have written about how the President could solve his problems and, to frame his current predicament, I basically ask: What does George Bush want to be -- the Houston Astros, or the White Sox? It's an interesting approach, and I think you'll enjoy it, particularly if you enjoy baseball.
Little known to most people, Kofi Annan and the United Nations would like to get their paws on the Internet -- to control it. Read more about it
(my first post on the subject is here
Here, I stumbled upon various findings
, each of interest. Like, let's take one of those findings: A Pat Buchanan article that begins with this: "“The Third Reich is the best example,” and launches into a story about Hitler’s 100% legal chancellery." That's not the only interesting thing, of course, but that's what I'm trying to hook you with. ;)
Now, there's a lesson to be learned from Mike Brown's recently released emails, and that's that FEMA is only skin-deep.
Brent Scowcroft, George H.W. Bush's National Security Advisor, has come out in opposition to George W. Bush's policies and has become a mini-hero to liberals everywhere. Here, I argue that the Left should say No to Scowcroft.
The SCOTUS nomination by George W. Bush last week shows that he's feeling Alito Trigger Happy.
Very cute play of words, I think. It's also noteworthy as it contains a bit of commentary on that, as well as a link to the best article about Nuclear Weapons I've ever read: An expose exposing the fact that suitcase nukes do not exist.
Finally, The Minority Has Struck Back
against the Republicans in the Senate by shutting it down, and, in maybe my most feisty and combative post, I write about the riots going on in France and the fact that they expose great problems with the Radical Left's approach to terrorism, particularly France's.
That's all for now. Please visit The Office of the Independent Blogger
. I promise you'll enjoy your time there!
|Wednesday, April 20th, 2005|
* A bill is pending in Congress that would exempt
the Internet from the campaign finance
regulations. It's called the "Online Freedom of
* The entire bill is just one sentence long. The
bill would give the Internet the same "freedom of
the press" exemption that the mainstream media
has. There's no reason the Internet should be
treated any differently than the mainstream
* DownsizeDC.org is conducting an online lobbying
campaign to get Congress to pass this
legislation. People can use DownsizeDC's
Electronic Lobbyist to ask their Representative
and their Senators to sponsor this bill. They can
do so by clicking here http://action.downsizedc.org/wyc.php?cid=22
|Sunday, March 27th, 2005|
A few weeks ago, the price of oil ratcheted above fifty-five dollars a barrel, which is about twenty dollars a barrel more than a year ago. The next day, the oil story was buried on page six of the New York Times business section. Apparently, the price of oil is not considered significant news, even when it goes up five bucks a barrel in the span of ten days. That same day, the stock market shot up more than a hundred points because, CNN said, government data showed no signs of inflation. Note to clueless nation: Call planet Earth.
Carl Jung, one of the fathers of psychology, famously remarked that "people cannot stand too much reality." What you're about to read may challenge your assumptions about the kind of world we live in, and especially the kind of world into which events are propelling us. We are in for a rough ride through uncharted territory.
It has been very hard for Americans -- lost in dark raptures of nonstop infotainment, recreational shopping and compulsive motoring -- to make sense of the gathering forces that will fundamentally alter the terms of everyday life in our technological society. Even after the terrorist attacks of 9/11, America is still sleepwalking into the future. I call this coming time the Long Emergency.
Read this article. It is very disturbing
|Monday, March 21st, 2005|
My girlfriend has been telling me all about this Schiavo case that has been all over the news, because she's been following it pretty closely and reading up on a lot of the background information that's available on the net, for what that's worth. She seems to give a lot of credit to the lady's husband. After all, couldn't he just have divorced this lady when she became completely incapacitated?
Also, apparently he became a registered nurse so that he could help care for her... I think that's what my girlfriend mentioned to me last night (I was doing schoolwork at the time, so I don't recall exactly what she said). It seems pretty clear cut to me... He's her husband, so absent some sort of prior documentation from Mrs. Schiavo herself, it seems like her husband has power of attorney in this instance. I don't see how we have a reason to doubt what he's saying... Considering he could have a) walked away from this with $10 Million offered to him by someone who wanted to use Mrs. Schiavo as some sort of medical testing ground for stem cell research (correct me if I'm wrong), b) divorced her (not sure about this, but I would imagine that he could), or c) NOT bothered to become a registered nurse to take care of her, he sure is going very far out of his way to convince us that she would want to die. I don't see any real possible gain for this guy, other than perhaps some emotional closure of a situation, and knowing that he was honoring his wife's wishes.
I think that there's probably something in all of us that would like to see Mrs. Schiavo's condition improve. But, according to what I've seen and heard, she has not made any improvement that would lead us to believe that such a recovery is possible in the entire time she's been in this condition.( I think that the call to remove Terri Schiavo's feeding tube is one upon which reasonable people can disagree. Collapse )x-posted all over the place
|Sunday, March 13th, 2005|
|Thursday, March 10th, 2005|
let's get this party started, quickly
the subject of gay marriage got me thinking... i am against marriage licenses from any government body. we do not need permission from the government to get married.
can anybody see a logical reason for the government to be licensing marriage? come on, there has to be a valid, compelling, and substantial reason for them. otherwise the state governments wouldn't have them, right?
i doubt it.
thoughts? Current Mood: mischievous